Most Active Stories
- Storms And Muddy Delta Water Lead To Voluntary Pumping Cutback
- Joe Mathews: Forget Anaheim, Bring Disneyland To Fresno
- Study Says California Drought Caused By Natural Climate Patterns
- Infill Is Key To Fresno's New General Plan, But It's Also Controversial
- Strong Storms May Not Improve California Water Supply Much
Valley Public Radio Staff
Mon December 30, 2013
San Joaquin River Restoration Hits Snags
It’s been almost eight years since the US Bureau of Reclamation began its program to restore the San Joaquin River. In the 1940’s Friant Dam and irrigation diversion dried up 60 miles of California’s second largest river. Historic salmon runs disappeared. This January is the deadline for the program to restore enough water to the San Joaquin to eventually allow runs of Chinook salmon. But as Amy Quinton reports from Sacramento, the restoration program has been plagued by delays and increased costs.
I’m following fish biologists with the US Bureau of Reclamation into the cold waters of the San Joaquin River, near its confluence with the Merced River.
The biologists are checking nets they’ve placed in the river for salmon. It’s near the end of the season for fall-run Chinook, so they catch just two.
Salmon sometimes manage to make it through a fish barrier here. If they do, biologist Chuck Hueth says they face a certain death.
“There’s a section in the middle that’s dry so the salmon can’t make it up that far,” says Hueth.
Biologists tag and measure the salmon. Because the river runs dry, they truck the salmon up river and release them near Fresno.
Before the Friant Dam was built, tens of thousands of salmon spawned in the San Joaquin. The goal of the San Joaquin River Restoration Program is to bring back the river and the fish. It’s the result of a 2006 legal settlement involving environmentalists, the Bureau of Reclamation, and farmers who get their water from the Friant operation. Monty Schmitt is a scientist with the Natural Resources Defense Council.
“What we’re taking on is quite a substantial effort. It is probably the largest restoration project in California, and probably one of the largest in US history,” says Schmitt.
No one expected immediate results. But after eight years and $100 million, the river still runs dry. Major channel improvements including fish screens were supposed to be completed by the end of 2013.
“They haven’t turned one shovel of dirt on this entire system,” says Cannon Michael, who stands in front of a dry river channel choked with shrubs and trees.
“So there’s nothing that’s been started physically and so that’s where we are saying now you’re missing your own deadlines let’s figure out some other kind of a plan that makes sense for everybody,” says Michael.
Michael and his father-in-law Jim Nickel farm near the river. Nickel’s farmland was damaged when the restoration program released test flows down the old channel in 2009. Groundwater seeped into his crops.
“Yes that was the mighty San Joaquin river, it’s sad, but let’s be realistic you can’t replace some things you can’t go back, there’s a money issue, it’s just a reality issue, it just doesn’t work,” says Nickel.
Both Michael and Nickel say the restoration project lacks money. Nickel says they’ve grown frustrated with the delays.
“It’s costing me probably $100,000 a year just for personnel, engineers, attorneys that’s what it cost me, we go to meetings once or twice a month, it was more than that and we spend all this time,” says Nickel.
The Bureau of Reclamation did reimburse Nickel for the damages. Alicia Forsythe, Program Manager for the restoration program, says many of the delays were unavoidable. The recession hit just as the project was beginning. Water seepage stalled projects. The land is sinking in an area where a new fish screen is needed.
“The settlement assumed that those projects would begin immediately, that there would be willing access from all landowners. That basically everything would fall perfectly in line for these projects, and we find that that’s just not reality,” says Forsythe.
The problems and delays have escalated costs. The program’s original estimate was between $250 to $800 million. Now Forsythe says it’s closer to a billion. She says the schedule for the projects will be revised again, based on priority and what she calls more realistic funding.
Scott West says it may be a frustrating wait, but it’s worth it. He’s president of Fresno Fly Fishers for Conservation. Despite that title, he says being able to fish for salmon once again in the San Joaquin isn’t his primary desire.
“I don’t believe in giving up on that river. I’d like to see us fix a past wrong,” says West.
The Bureau of Reclamation is hopeful that the San Joaquin River will be reconnected in 2014. Barriers would still prevent adult salmon from making it up and down the river. But for the first time in 60 years, endangered spring-run Chinook salmon will be reintroduced into the river.