Most Active Stories
- Storms And Muddy Delta Water Lead To Voluntary Pumping Cutback
- Joe Mathews: Forget Anaheim, Bring Disneyland To Fresno
- Study Says California Drought Caused By Natural Climate Patterns
- Infill Is Key To Fresno's New General Plan, But It's Also Controversial
- Strong Storms May Not Improve California Water Supply Much
Valley Public Radio Staff
Wed November 6, 2013
How Many Americans Live In Poverty?
Originally published on Wed November 6, 2013 12:11 pm
As we reported earlier this year, there are some big problems with the way poverty is measured in this country. So we were interested to see a Census report out today based on the "supplemental poverty measure" — a newer, unofficial method that figures in the value of many government benefits, the cost of living in different cities, and health-care costs.
A few of the report's key findings:
- Almost 50 million people in the U.S. are poor using the supplemental measure, compared to the 47 million using the official measure.
- Food stamps (formally known as SNAP) keep about five million people out of poverty, according to the supplemental measure.
- Without Social Security more than half of all Americans 65 and over would be in poverty. (Both supplemental and traditional poverty measures include Social Security benefits.)
- Under the supplemental measure, which includes cost-of-living differences, poverty is much higher in expensive states like California and New York, and lower in places like Alabama and Kentucky.
- The poverty rate for children goes down under the supplemental measure and it goes up for those 65 and older. That's because the supplemental measure includes the impact of out-of-pocket medical expenses (which are high for senior citizens) and of certain government benefits that go disproportionately to children.
In other supplemental-poverty-related news, a study out of UC Berkeley finds that using the supplemental measure is especially useful in identifying the most serious cases: families that are chronically poor.
Sara Kimberlin, author of the Berkeley study, used the supplemental poverty measure to look at poverty over an 11-year period. She found that chronic poverty — those who were poor for more than half that time — was lower than previously thought. Only about two percent of people were chronically poor under the supplemental measure, compared with 3.3 percent under the official rate.
This is important, because research shows that chronic poverty does the most long-term harm to people, especially children.
Kimberlin says most people in poverty are poor for a short period of time, because government benefits help lift them back above the poverty line. And it's only a big setback — like a job loss or unexpected medical bill — that pulls them back down.
The supplemental measure "makes it easier to think about solutions," Kimberlin says, because you can get an idea which programs are doing the most good.